Youth Fund: it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity

“You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, ‘You are free to compete with all the others,’ and still justly believe that you have been completely fair… it is not enough just to open the gates of opportunity. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through those gates. This is the next and more profound stage…” - President Lyndon Johnson.

Teething problems in both the youth and women enterprise development funds have emerged. This week, no less than the Planning Minister Wycliffe Oparanya was urging financial intermediaries to relax their requirements for youths seeking to cash in on the enterprise fund loans.

Recently, the minister for Gender and Children Affairs, Esther Murugi had also expressed concern that over Sh700 million meant for women projects had not been disbursed.

Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink!

It seems that there is so much money available but the means of accessing it are dead ends. In common parlance: money, money everywhere, but no way to get it in the pocket.

As long as these funds rely on financial intermediaries, they will continue to have problems of their target populations being unable to access these funds.

After all these intermediaries are banks, and banks are in the business of giving loans whilst enforcing conditions and requirements that make it difficult for the person taking the loan to default. So, without any culture change in the banking fraternity, you can still expect the loan officer in the bank to ensure that the youth or woman entrepreneur has a viable business that will pay back the loan. This will happen regardless of whether the government wants to throw the money at these people. If that is how they will measure their performance in terms of beneficiaries of loans, then we suggest that they put a desk in front of the Kenyatta International Conference Centre (KICC) and give loans to any Tom, Ochieng or Wanjiku who happens to be strolling past them.

Both the youth and gender ministries should not feel toothless if they cannot reach their stipulated number of entrepreneurs. They also must remember that small business owners have a natural aversion to exposing their business to risk, and thus are hesitant to take out loans.

In seeking funds, small business owners tend to use what can be described as the ‘pecking order’ model. This suggests that entrepreneur’s attitude towards and use of financial sources are most positive towards first, internally generated equity (for instance injecting own savings into the enterprise), followed by debt financing from sources such as banks.

Small business entrepreneurs also prefer sources of finance associated with the least information asymmetry. It is easier to approach your brother for a startup loan than it is to wade through the rigorous formalities of a bank loan. For one, you need a fully developed business plan, something not many people in business have. This requirement is also asked for when seeking finance from the youth and women’s funds.

There is also the ‘theory of the discouraged borrowers’ (Kon and Storey, 2003) which posits that some existing small business owners believe they will not be successful in obtaining external finance and therefore do not apply.

Apart from a shyness in opening oneself to be asked confidential questions on one’s business, there is also the overriding need to maintain control of one’s business. Thus such firms prefer using retained profits and cash flow to fund their business development, rather than opening up themselves to losing control of their enterprise. This is why seeking capital from personal savings or other informal sources (such as family and friends) is the preferred option for entrepreneurs who seek to minimize intrusion into their businesses.

The emergence of the micro finance sector has somewhat filled in this gap as a particular type of informal finance that takes the form of a small loan to individuals. However, as can be seen from the rapid growth of Equity, Family and K-REP Banks, these institutions have now outgrown this approach and their operations are now more akin to commercial banks than the informal micro-finance.

So instead of forcing entrepreneurs to take their money, the two funds can actually reach more enterprises if they become innovative in assisting existing small business owners to expand their businesses.

Apart from solely financing entrepreneurs, the funds could have more impact if they were in a position to expand business opportunities by providing collateral support, mentorship and technical assistance, which are lacking or too expensive for many small enterprise owners.

Loan guarantees can assist entrepreneurs with the potential for success but lack the current capacity to qualify for conventional bank loans to access more funds than are currently available within the funds. This will enable such businesses to expand so they can achieve the economies of scale that are necessary to compete with larger businesses.

Both fund managers can also learn lessons from the US Small Business Administration (SBA). Innovatively this independent agency is mandated to enter into contracts with Federal (government) Agencies and then sublet these contracts to small firms, that is apart from assisting small businesses in obtaining government contracts.

The Small Business Act (1953) which created the SBA also has a small business subcontracting clause in all government contracts over $10,000, requiring Federal Agencies to publicize in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD) all procurements over the small purchase threshold and any others with subcontract potential.

In lieu of setting up that table outside KICC, this could be a more impactful solution to both funds, that is if their sole measure of performance is how many groups of entrepreneurs they finance.

No small business owner would pass up the chance to grow their business by receiving technical expertise or collateral to access higher value loans. Neither would they refuse to competitively take part in the profitable public procurement market sector.